Spencer Circuit Case 89-CI-0083
Case to settle an Estate
Library
of Congress Copyright No. TX-4-487-022
dated 1 Apr 1996
TX4-558-085 11 Jul 1997
TX4-640-452 22 Dec 1997
by Robert Hedges -
- CI-0083 Dale Complaint to Dissolve Liens and Settle Estate
(1)(2)(3) 10 Oct 1989 -[
Comment HEDGES - This case was not filed to hear evidence of
facts or determine the application of ancient common law or
statute lien law to a farm. Plaintiff did not dispute any
specific fact, for which a defendant could produce specific
evidence. Courts do not have time to hear evidence of undisputed
facts, and evidence of facts alleged is only presentable after
any given alleged fact is denied. KY Rule then makes the cost of
the falsely-disputed fact chargeable to the lying/disputing party
. |
- CI-0083 Official Estate Documents (1)(2)(3) |
- CI-0083 Dale threat of contempt Motion Notice 18/28
Oct 1989 [ Comment HEDGES - The threat of
contempt is a serious thing to use in an attempt to extort from a
defendant the property rights which statute law provides. A Rule
11 Sanction is in called for when a motion is frivolous for lack
of a basis in law. |
- CI-0083 Dale Motion to Strike
Response 3 Nov 1989 [ Comment HEDGES -
This motion is frivolous because a defendant forced to defend
himself cannot be denied his defenses by a technical rule of
pleading, such as the size of the page the defense is printed
upon. The defense remains true and does not become unavailable
to a defendant even if single-spaced on odd size paper.
|
- CI-0083 Dale Memorandum (1)(2)(3)(4) 3 Nov 1989 [ Comment HEDGES - One document in here pleads for the Saunders Circuit Court to "hold Hedges liens for naught" This translates into no pay for years of work and no reinbursement for long-term investment dollars. If any legal principle supports the success of such a motion, then the same legal principle presumed to exist can just as easily "hold a lawyer's work for naught" or "hold a real estate broker's work for naught" without any dispute of fact allowed, or any reason presented by the court. |
- CI-0083 Dale Answer 6 Nov 1989 |
- CI-0083 Dale Memorandum (1)(2)(3)(4) 1989 |
- CI-0083 RH Memorandum (1)(2)(3)(4) Dec 1989 |
- CI-0083 Put Lien on Empty Judgment Bank Account Nov 1989 [ Comment HEDGES - This is a NULLITY, because it
violates KRS 372. The Motion which urges this violation of the
law is frivolous also. |
- CI-0083 Dale Notice to Reschedule
21 Nov to 19 Dec 1989 14 Nov 1989 |
- CI-0083 Dale Motion (1)(2) 17 Jan 1990 |
- CI-0083 Dale Motion Notice to Submit for Ruling 17 Jul 1990 |
- CI-0083 Dismissal of all claims Judgment 17 Jul 1990 |
- CI-0083 Case List |
- CI-0083 Recap |
- CI-0083 Certified Record Cover
Page 28 MAR 1991 |
- CI-0083 RH Answer to Complaint (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 17 Oct 1989
|
- CI-0083 RH Answer to Pltf Memorandum (1)
(2)(3) 14 Dec
1989 |
- CI-0083 Robert Hedges Motion
14 Dec 1989 |
- 89-CI-0083 - RH Answer for Dec 1989 (1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 1989 |
Go back to Case Document CD Index
Go back to the main menu
Last modified: November 1997
